User talk:Googuse

Wikihawks beware! 05:21, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

come on...

I took care of Lord Nasty, cant someone else do the Funkapus???

be stealth and...

post your digits for a few minutes.

so whats up?

where are they now

salary about that you big fag. tried to leave most of your article intact but it was crying for substance. everyone knows virgil is more of a ramen guy and i havent played video games for a living for at least 10 years. (unless online poker counts).

so...

who is you?

confession time

Atom here.

John Tynan

...was the road manager for Dieselhed and Link Wray. He also worked for the Bangles at some point as a Jr. Road Crew member as well as others (hope others will expand). I hope you will consider leaving his entry as he has become an infamous behind-the-scenes character in many music circles. A poor man's Peter Grant if you will. Bands who would probably vouch for his relevance include: Cake, Link Wray, Dieselhed, Dengue Fever, Radar Bros, Grandaddy, The Bangles, Soul Assylum, Fast Ball, The White Stripes (or at least their booking agent Dave Kaplan), etc...

He's legit.

Dieselhed photo

This was a commissioned piece I secured for the band. It is an original piece paid for in full to one of those portrait painting guys who will take random pictures that you have and create a family portrait from scratch. This work was going to be included in the 'Chico And The Flute' album artwork but was vetoed last minute by drummer Danny. It warms my heart that it can finally be made useful! The painting was purchased and is owned by me. The photo of the piece was taken and owned by me. Youre all clear.

RCR

You made a good job at expanding RCR. I don't know much about them, but created the stub a few months ago in the hope somebody would expand it. I am glad that now it's a failry descent entry. Cheers! --Sn0wflake 14:33, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Your request

A coupla days back, you asked for assistance on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) about creating a pharmaceutical stub. Just so you know, I did reply a little while ago. Incidentally, if you want help of this kind, it should really be addressed to Wikipedia:Help Desk. Cheers, Smoddy (t) (e) 19:35, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Laura Bush

I have protected the page to your version. If anyone suggests changes on the talk page, please discuss those changes with them. I don't plan to make any changes to the article myself; I regard your version as an acceptable compromise.

Please be aware of Wikipedia:Three revert rule, which you broke at Laura Bush. Also, the edit summary comments (I can do this all day AND I'm getting paid for it.) are really not very helpful at all. -- Curps 00:46, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My point in informing you is just in case you weren't aware of it. -- Curps 05:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Advocate Request

I noted your request for an advocate, please contact me if you are still looking for one. --Wgfinley 20:50, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sexuality, promiscuity and drug use.

While the sexuality itself has nothing to do with compulsive sexual behavior among meth users, there is a clear difference among the culture of meth addiction that falls on a gay/straight line; undoubtedly due to the culture of meth addiction more so than the sexuality of the individual itself. There is a large number of straight meth users. They don't exhibit the unusual compulsive sexual behavior that gay men do, while using meth. It's a fact, however, that gay and bisexual men get HIV while using crystal during sexual encounters. It needs to be included in any article about methamphetamine, because it is significant enough. Leaving it out would be like leaving out the impact AIDS had on the gay community in the 1980s on an article about AIDS. ℬastique▼^talk 12:43, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

Hello Googuse... I'm Redwolf24 and I am the chair of the mediation committee. I regret to inform you that we are swamped with cases, and every mediator on our committee is busy. However there's good news. WP:TINMC is a mediation alternative. If you're interested in mediation still, file there. R e dwolf24 (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Records

Hi. Thanks for the lovely paragraph you wrote about Apple vs Apple. I've moved it to Apple Corps and you can see your handywork there! Cheers. --kingboyk 21:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Jimmy martin.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jimmy martin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an arguement why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 19:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Moondogalbum1.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Moondogalbum1.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 21:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hifives.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hifives.jpeg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Al Sobrante

Please note that my recent edit of Al Sobrante was directed at the myth behind how he aquired his name. Not his behavior during shows. That was an unintentional byproduct of my reversion. However, did you witness this behavior during his time with Green Day? Or just after when he was involved with the Ne'er Do Wells? I was in the audience for many Isocracy and Al Sobrante era Green Day shows and never saw any behavior that matches your description.

Silvertone (instruments)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Silvertone (instruments), but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! (jarbarf) 19:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rlipsrsealed.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rlipsrsealed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rlipsrsealed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rlipsrsealed.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Riana_ऋ 06:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Silvertonelp.jpeg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Silvertonelp.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hifives.jpeg

I have tagged Image:Hifives.jpeg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Digthenewbreed.jpeg

I have tagged Image:Digthenewbreed.jpeg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wynnstewart.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wynnstewart.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tsoj.jpeg

I have tagged Image:Tsoj.jpeg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jimmy_martin.jpg

I have tagged Image:Jimmy_martin.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ill10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ill10.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Hifives.jpeg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Hifives.jpeg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 15:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nsclogo175.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nsclogo175.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wynnstewart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wynnstewart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fruitcake (film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fruitcake (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fruitcake (film). JASpencer (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Silvertonelp.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Silvertonelp.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tsoj.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsoj.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Digthenewbreed.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Digthenewbreed.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Annabelle Candy Company

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Annabelle Candy Company, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.annabelle-candy.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Wyden and cats

Please read WP:CAT on how we categorize things. Wyden is already in "Members of the US House from Oregon" and the matching senators cat. Both of those are sub categories of the Oregon politicians cat, thus he is already in that category through the sub cats. If you have any questions, please ask. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Trashwomen

A tag has been placed on The Trashwomen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Trashwomen

I have nominated The Trashwomen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Trashwomen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 06:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Trashwomen

A tag has been placed on The Trashwomen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Googuse! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Andy Cox - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Silvertone (instruments) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ralph Emery - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Denery - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chris Imlay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Klickitat Street

The article Klickitat Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non remarkable street in Portland.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've contested the PROD tag. Purple backpack89 03:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Klickitat Street for deletion

The article Klickitat Street is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klickitat Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Admrboltz (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Well said and thanks for creating Klickitat Street which is an engaging and promising topic read by many people every day. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Klickitat Street. While I understand it is frustrating to have an article you created nominated for deletion, I think you need to relax. At deletion discussions, it is best to comment on content, not the contributor. Labelling the nominator as a "wikihawk" is not helpful in any way. Wikipedia has over 3 million articles, and over 1000 are added every day. Some level of maintenance is required to keep this project operating as an encyclopedia and not just a place where anyone can create a page on any subject with any content, and the users who perform this maintenance are arguably as useful as those who create content. Anyway, it appears the article will probably be kept. Cheers. SnottyWong ^gossip 20:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Thank you for the Klickitat Street article. I found it interesting when I was drawn to it by the Rescue Squadron listing. Please remember Wikipedia:Civility, the first of the five pillars of Wikipedia. Sometimes other editors forget it, or never knew that they should be polite and civil here, but the rest of us should not respond in kind. Your article is going to be rescued by myself and other Rescue Squadron members. You provided the start, others are improving your start. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Googuse! I am Dthomsen8 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and provide you with a belated welcome to Wikipedia!

I love to help users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Enjoy the cookies, and keep up the good work! -- DThomsen8 (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Zinky

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bruce Zinky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 (talk) 20:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Velvet Underground Playlist Plus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Velvet Underground Playlist Plus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Velvet Underground Playlist Plus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Googuse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Denery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Denery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Denery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Googuse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Googuse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]