Talk:Whiskey Rebellion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whiskey Rebellion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Whiskey Rebellion has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 12, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 22, 2017.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that only two men who participated in the Whiskey Rebellion were convicted of treason, but were later pardoned by President George Washington?

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 7, 2004.

Military history: North America / United States / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Pittsburgh High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania High‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Typo. 78.174.52.181 (talk) 13:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Graham87 (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference states the opposite "robespierre"

Article states:

"David Bradford, it was said, was comparing himself to Robespierre, a leader of the French Reign of Terror."

This as ONE of the sources uses: "Slaughter 1986, pp. 188–89;" however when I went to look this source up it states the opposite:

"Still there was no organized movement with clearly defined goals. No individuals with the talents of Sam Adams, John Wilkes, or Robespierre emerged to unite and direct this inchoate movement of disgruntled frontiersmen."

Certainly reference should be removed or cited in opposition to the other reference?Msj242 (talk) 04:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that Slaughter does not support the claim that Bradford was comparing himself to Robespierre. Perhaps Hogeland does?

I looked for it in Crytzer, and found this on page 90: "He was truly a man of the era of revolution, a Robespierre of the West, and ..." Crytzer is speaking in an ironic voice. This doesn't directly help us figure out who, right then and there, might have compared Bradford to Robespierre. Bruce leverett (talk) 23:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Higginbotham?

Two footnotes are citations to a book by "Higginbotham", but there is no such book in the bibliography. Can anyone suggest where we should look for this? Bruce leverett (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in infobox

@IkuTurisas and Cinderella157: There has been an interesting discussion of this, but it's past time to move the discussion to here, the talk page, rather than carry on an edit war.

An example of a military confrontation in which battle flags of the combatants are given in the infobox is Battle of Shiloh. Is this appropriate for Whiskey Rebellion?

MOS:MILFLAGS says, Can flag icons be used consistently? In other words, do all the groups in a given list have usable flags? If only a few have them, it may be better to omit flags for all the items than to have a different layout for each one. Our article discusses (in the In popular culture section) whether the tax protestors had a battle flag, and concludes that they probably didn't.

The characterization of this event as a "military conflict" or even a "rebellion", despite the common usage, is dubious. The federal government raised an army and sent it to Western Pennsylvania, but all it did there was round up suspects for civilian trials. There was no actual battlefield confrontation, because the tax protest leaders had all fled. Earlier, the tax protest leaders had led an armed force into Pittsburgh, but this force too met no armed opposition. The closest thing to a battle that occurred was when an armed force attacked and burned down Neville's estate; at least there were shots fired and casualties.

Crytzer describes the Whiskey Rebellion as the largest insurrection in the United States before the Civil War. But even the template for infobox military conflict fits poorly: the entries in the right side column are perfunctory and unhelpful. Bruce leverett (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:MILFLAGS gives detail on when there is acceptable use of infobox flags. This does not fall to being such a case. While MOS:INFOBOXFLAGS notes an exception for military conflicts the exception has a caveat - the flags must still serve a useful purpose. Regardless of whether this should or shouldn't use the military conflict infobox, the flag should not be there. The guidance is clear. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]